‘Fake News’ Reinforces Trust in Mainstream News Brands: Hits Reputation of Social Media Sources

Kantar ‘Trust in News’ study reveals ‘mainstream news media’
reputation remains largely intact while social media and digital-only
news platforms sustain major reputation damage as result of ‘fake news’
narratives during recent election cycles.


LONDON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Kantar today releases the results of its global ‘Trust in News’ study.
The report, which surveyed 8,000 individuals across Brazil, France, the
United Kingdom and the United States of America about their attitudes to
news coverage of politics and elections, finds:

1. The efforts to brand ‘mainstream news media’ as ‘fake news’
have largely failed. The reputation of traditional print and broadcast
media outlets has proven more resilient than social media platforms and
online only news outlets, primarily as a result of the depth of coverage
being delivered.

2. Audiences are becoming more widely informed and sophisticated in
their engagement with, and evaluation of, news content.

3. The public retain a belief that journalism is key to the health of
democracy – but have become more skeptical. Specifically, in both in
Brazil and USA, where a significant percentage of the population believe
‘fake news’ impacted the outcome of their most recent elections.

Who do we trust?

The reputational fallout of the ‘fake news’ phenomenon has been
predominantly borne by social media and messaging platforms, and ‘online
only’ news channels. Print magazines, at 72%, are the most trusted news
source, closely followed by the other traditional outlets of print
newspapers and TV and radio news. Only one in three recognize social
media sites and messaging apps as a trusted news source. ‘Online only’
news outlets are trusted by half of the population, significantly less
than their print and broadcast brethren. Interestingly, the online
presence of print and broadcast media are trusted slightly less than the
originating titles and channels.

Social media and messaging platforms have sustained significant
reputational damage as a source of trusted news. News coverage of
politics and elections on social media platforms (among which
Facebook is dominant with 84% usage in the preceding week
) and
messaging apps (of which Whatsapp is the most used) is ‘trusted
less’ by almost sixty percent of news audiences (58% & 57% respectively)
because of the ‘fake news’ phenomenon. ‘Online only’ news outlets also
sustained significant reputational damage in this respect: ‘trusted
less’ by 41% of news audiences.

Print titles have proved more resilient, experiencing a smaller loss of
trust, with print magazines and newspapers both ‘trusted less’ by 23% of
audiences. However, both categories also experienced similar increases
in trust in their coverage (23% and 17% respectively). Print media nets
out with more than three quarters of news audiences trusting them ‘the
same’ or ‘more than’ before the ‘fake news’ phenomenon. 24-hour news
channels also retain a strong position as a trusted source with 78% of
news audiences trusting them ‘the same’ or ‘more than’ before the ‘fake
news’ narrative.

Across all four surveyed countries, 46% of news audiences believe ‘fake
news’ had an influence on the outcome of their most recent election.
This was most pronounced in Brazil – where 69% believed fake news had an
impact, and the USA where 47% believe there was an influence. There is
though some recognition that companies like Facebook and Google are
taking steps to tackle ‘fake news’. (13% of UK news audiences claiming
to have seen efforts vs a third of Brazilians, 16% in France and 22% in
the US).

News consumption habits are evolving.

The news-reading public are becoming a more widely informed audience.
40% of news audiences have increased the number of news sources they use
compared to 12 months prior. ‘All online’ has overtaken television as
the primary source of news (figure 3). With under 35 year olds, social
media – despite its reputational issues –almost matches television as a
source of news (65% Vs 69%).

The news audience is additionally becoming a more thoughtful audience.
Contrary to ‘news filter bubble’ or ‘echo chamber’ narratives, we find
40% of social media users explore alternate views to their own and
almost two thirds worry that ‘personalization’ will create a ‘news
filter bubble’. More than three quarters of news consumers claim to have
independently fact-checked a story, while 70% have reconsidered sharing
an article – worried that it might be fake news. On the flip side,
almost one in five admit to sharing a story after reading only the
headline.

The Kantar ‘Trust in News’ survey conducted representative sample
surveys of 2,000 individuals each in Brazil, France, the United Kingdom
and the United States of America. A more complete summary of the survey
can be found on Kantar
Insight
pages, along with access to the full report.

Quotes:

Eric Salama, CEO, Kantar

“Traditional news media have largely defended itself against the “fake
news” accusations and continue to enjoy high levels of trust among news
audiences. The challenge now is for those companies to monetize that
loyalty and we’ve identified some routes for them to explore.
Traditional news media need to have the confidence to invest in their
brands, while devising flexible subscription models for younger
generations of consumers who have grown comfortable with subscription
models. Trust in News will prove a rich source of insight for all
news providers trying to navigate this societally-important and
fast-changing market.”

Sir Martin Sorrell, CEO, WPP

I am pleased to see Trust in News confirm that brand
recognition is still a key driver for direct engagement between news
brands and consumers. We know the major social media companies have
started to address the ‘fake news’ problem. In quantifying the extent to
which ‘fake news’ has damaged the reputations of social media brands as
sources of news, this study reinforces how important that work will be
moving forward.”

—End—

Note to Editors – US DATA POINTS

Social Media still has more believers than non-believers:

  • 37% of Americans believe social media outlets can provide trustworthy
    news, which is far less than the 70%* that feel that printed news
    outlets, including magazines, provide them with trustworthy news.
  • Older respondents (over 55 years old) were more likely to have an
    “untrustworthy” viewpoint vs younger.

*this is the average between National newspapers (75% positive); Local
newspapers (61% positive); and news magazines (74% positive)

Political ideology affects how consumers gauge social media’s
trustworthiness

  • Nearly half (47%) of right-leaning consumers have a positive outlook
    on social media’s ability to provide them with news they can trust,
    while only 22% of left-leaning respondents shared that same view.
  • On the flipside, left-leaning respondents were more likely to describe
    news on social media as untrustworthy (37%) compared to right-leaning
    ones (23%).

Newspapers are proving far more resilient to “fake news” epidemic
than social media

  • More than half (59%)** of Americans say hearing about “fake news”
    hasn’t affected their level of trust in newspapers, and 17% said it’s
    actually increased their level of trust.
  • However, 24% admit that “fake news” has decreased their level of trust
    in newspapers.
  • When it comes to social media, 54% of Americans say that “fake news”
    has eroded their trust in those sources.

** Average between national and local newspapers

What is “fake news”?

  • Overall, more than 60% of Americans believe the term “fake news” is
    defined as a story that is factually incorrect, either by mistake or
    on purpose.
  • 72% of right-leaning Americans believe that “fake news” means a story
    that is deliberately fabricated by a mainstream news outlet.
  • When it comes to moderate or left-leaning respondents, a little more
    than half would use that definition.
  • Only 37% believe that “fake news” is something put out by someone
    masquerading as a news outlet.

How consumptions habits have changed

Americans are varied in how they get their news, though social media
is becoming a primary news source

  • 38% of Americans said they get their news by using social media.
  • The next-most cited was a tie (36%) between keyword searches or
    directly accessing news websites and apps.
  • Despite holding an unfavorable view of social media’s trustworthiness,
    left-leaning respondents were more likely to use it as their main news
    source (44%) compared to right-leaning (35%).
  • Showing its place as the dominant social media platform, Facebook was
    overwhelmingly cited as the top news source on social, with 85% saying
    they use the platform as a news source.

Life beyond the Advertising

Americans want news to remain free to access, believing that media
outlets still get enough ad revenue to support themselves:

  • Nearly ¾ of Americans (72%) say they haven’t paid for any kind of news
    content online in the past year.
  • Compared to the global sample, Americans are more likely to buy a
    newspaper, with 45% saying they’ve purchased one in the past week,
    compared to 40% of global respondents.
  • More than half (56%) don’t see the point in paying for online news
    (via a subscription fee) because they can access everything they need
    for free.
  • Just 8% feel it’s their duty to pay for unbiased and independent
    journalism.
  • 21% feel that news organizations get enough money from online
    advertising to support themselves.

Contacts

Daddi Brand Communications
Bill Daddi, 646-370-1341
917-620-3717
Bill@DaddiBrand.com