#Blockchain Bitfinex Partnered With at Least 6 Different Banks During 2018

22 months since Wells Fargo suspended the processing of withdrawals sent by four Taiwanese banks that service Bitfinex, the platform remains among the top 20 exchanges by adjusted volume. While Bitfinex hosted more than $5 billion in trade this past month, the exchange has struggled to establish reliable banking partners, with traders seeking to deposit fiat currency having been instructed to send funds via at least seven different banking institutions since the Wells Fargo suspension.

Also Read: Van Eck Associates CEO: Bitcoin Investors Will Add Gold This Year

Bitfinex Directs Customers to Deposit Funds With Polish Bank 7 Months After Wells Fargo Termination

During Nov. 2017, it was reported that Bitfinex customers were being directed to deposit fiat currency with Polish-based bank Spółdzielczy w Skierniewicach under the account of Panama-based company Crypto SP, an account that was also revealed to be shared with cryptocurrency exchange CEX. Crypto SP was also found to be owned by Crypto Capital, a company owned by Ivan Manual Molina Lee, an individual found to be a nominee director for a number of Panama-based companies.

Bitfinex Partnered With at Least 6 Different Banks During 2018

Later that month, the Paradise Papers evidenced that Tether and Bitfinex shared the same directors, contradicting Bitfinex’s previous assertions that the companies comprised completely separate entities.

During January 2018, it was reported that Bitfinex had been subpoenaed by the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The months following the news of the subpoena saw Bitfinex appear to cycle through banking partners in short succession, with traders being instructed to make fiat deposits with at least six different financial institutions between Feb. 2018 and Nov. 2018.

Bitfinex Customers Directed to Deposit Funds With at Least 6 Banks Between Feb. and Nov. 2018

At the start of Feb. 2018, a post on Reddit indicated that a Bitfinex customer had been directed to deposit funds with Portuguese-state owned banking institution Caixa Geral De Depositos via a company called Global Trade Solutions. One Redditor speculated that Global Trade Solutions may be linked to Crypto S.P and Crypto Capital.

On Feb. 14, 2018, Dutch media outlet Follow the Money reported that a spokesperson for ING had confirmed that Bitfinex held an account with the bank in the Netherlands. The news comprised the first announcement of a major financial institution since Wells Fargo suspended wires from Bitfinex almost one year prior.

Bitfinex Partnered With at Least 6 Different Banks During 2018

On April 6, 2018, Polish media reported that 400 euros had been seized by authorities from Spółdzielczy w Skierniewicach. Citing anonymous sources, the report asserted that the funds “probably” comprised “money belonging to Colombian drug cartels.” The report added “It is known that the money was on the accounts of two companies from the vicinity of Pruszków, owned by a Canadian-born Panamanian descent and a Colombian with Panama citizenship,” and that “One of these companies was a shareholder of an online cryptocurrency exchange office.”

The report also noted that the companies involved “did not actually carry out any economic activity,” and were created “solely to share bank accounts with international criminal financial operations.” On April 9, 2018, Bitfinex issued a statement denying any connection to the funds seized by Polish authorities.

Bitfinex Briefly Partners With Noble Bank

During May 2018, it was reported that Bitfinex had partnered with Puerto Rican financial institution, Noble Bank whose principal custodian was Bank of New York Mellon.

Three months later, a report published on Medium asserted that Brock Pierce, the founder of Tether, and John Betts, the founder of Noble Bank, had sought to acquire Mt. Gox together in 2014 via Sunlot Holdings’ Mtgox Rehabilitation Plan Proposal. After their bid was unsuccessful, both men would go on to found their respective companies later that year.

Bitfinex Partnered With at Least 6 Different Banks During 2018

At the start of October 2018, it was reported that Noble International had been looking for a buyer for months, and had lost many of its customers including Bitfinex and Tether. A few days later, it was revealed that Bitfinex was directing customers to deposit fiat currency into an HSBC account held by Global Trading Solutions.

Later that month, reports also indicated that Bitfinex was banking with Hong Kong-based Bank of Communications via the private accounts of “Prosperity Revenue Merchandising Limited” for whom Citibank acts as an intermediary bank.

In November, Bitifinex announced another new banking partner, publishing a letter attributed to Bahamas Deltec Bank & Trust asserting that the company held $1.8 billion in its account as of Oct. 31.

Bitfinex’s Cayman-Based Bank Falsely Claims SEC Registration

During January 2019, it was revealed that Bitfinex was banking with Cayman Islands-based Sackville Bank & Trust Company. Sackville’s principal custodian bank is CIBC Mellon which is jointly owned by The Bank of New York Mellon and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.

Despite Sackville’s website asserting that the company operates according to its “full registration with US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),” it appears that Sackville’s SEC registration was terminated as of April 2018.

Bitfinex Partnered With at Least 6 Different Banks During 2018

Throughout Bitfinex’s banking fiasco, social media reports suggest that at least $1.67 million worth of fiat withdrawals have not been processed by the exchange since September 2018, in addition to nearly $3.57 million worth of unprocessed withdrawal attempts that have since been cancelled.

While discussing Wells Fargo’s suspension of wire transfers to and from Bitfinex, the exchange’s former chief strategy officer, Phil Potter, previously stated: “We’ve had banking hiccups in the past, we’ve always been able to route around it … open up new accounts … shift to a different entity, lots of cat and mouse tricks.”

What do you think of Bitfinex’s perpetual banking drama? Share your thoughts in the comments section below!


Images courtesy of Shutterstock, Wikipedia


Want to create your own secure cold storage paper wallet? Check our tools section.

The post Bitfinex Partnered With at Least 6 Different Banks During 2018 appeared first on Bitcoin News.

from Bitcoin News http://bit.ly/2MFsKvM Bitfinex Partnered With at Least 6 Different Banks During 2018

#Blockchain Bitfinex Partnered With at Least 6 Different Banks During 2018

22 months since Wells Fargo suspended the processing of withdrawals sent by four Taiwanese banks that service Bitfinex, the platform remains among the top 20 exchanges by adjusted volume. While Bitfinex hosted more than $5 billion in trade this past month, the exchange has struggled to establish reliable banking partners, with traders seeking to deposit fiat currency having been instructed to send funds via at least seven different banking institutions since the Wells Fargo suspension.

Also Read: Van Eck Associates CEO: Bitcoin Investors Will Add Gold This Year

Bitfinex Directs Customers to Deposit Funds With Polish Bank 7 Months After Wells Fargo Termination

During Nov. 2017, it was reported that Bitfinex customers were being directed to deposit fiat currency with Polish-based bank Spółdzielczy w Skierniewicach under the account of Panama-based company Crypto SP, an account that was also revealed to be shared with cryptocurrency exchange CEX. Crypto SP was also found to be owned by Crypto Capital, a company owned by Ivan Manual Molina Lee, an individual found to be a nominee director for a number of Panama-based companies.

Bitfinex Partnered With at Least 6 Different Banks During 2018

Later that month, the Paradise Papers evidenced that Tether and Bitfinex shared the same directors, contradicting Bitfinex’s previous assertions that the companies comprised completely separate entities.

During January 2018, it was reported that Bitfinex had been subpoenaed by the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The months following the news of the subpoena saw Bitfinex appear to cycle through banking partners in short succession, with traders being instructed to make fiat deposits with at least six different financial institutions between Feb. 2018 and Nov. 2018.

Bitfinex Customers Directed to Deposit Funds With at Least 6 Banks Between Feb. and Nov. 2018

At the start of Feb. 2018, a post on Reddit indicated that a Bitfinex customer had been directed to deposit funds with Portuguese-state owned banking institution Caixa Geral De Depositos via a company called Global Trade Solutions. One Redditor speculated that Global Trade Solutions may be linked to Crypto S.P and Crypto Capital.

On Feb. 14, 2018, Dutch media outlet Follow the Money reported that a spokesperson for ING had confirmed that Bitfinex held an account with the bank in the Netherlands. The news comprised the first announcement of a major financial institution since Wells Fargo suspended wires from Bitfinex almost one year prior.

Bitfinex Partnered With at Least 6 Different Banks During 2018

On April 6, 2018, Polish media reported that 400 euros had been seized by authorities from Spółdzielczy w Skierniewicach. Citing anonymous sources, the report asserted that the funds “probably” comprised “money belonging to Colombian drug cartels.” The report added “It is known that the money was on the accounts of two companies from the vicinity of Pruszków, owned by a Canadian-born Panamanian descent and a Colombian with Panama citizenship,” and that “One of these companies was a shareholder of an online cryptocurrency exchange office.”

The report also noted that the companies involved “did not actually carry out any economic activity,” and were created “solely to share bank accounts with international criminal financial operations.” On April 9, 2018, Bitfinex issued a statement denying any connection to the funds seized by Polish authorities.

Bitfinex Briefly Partners With Noble Bank

During May 2018, it was reported that Bitfinex had partnered with Puerto Rican financial institution, Noble Bank whose principal custodian was Bank of New York Mellon.

Three months later, a report published on Medium asserted that Brock Pierce, the founder of Tether, and John Betts, the founder of Noble Bank, had sought to acquire Mt. Gox together in 2014 via Sunlot Holdings’ Mtgox Rehabilitation Plan Proposal. After their bid was unsuccessful, both men would go on to found their respective companies later that year.

Bitfinex Partnered With at Least 6 Different Banks During 2018

At the start of October 2018, it was reported that Noble International had been looking for a buyer for months, and had lost many of its customers including Bitfinex and Tether. A few days later, it was revealed that Bitfinex was directing customers to deposit fiat currency into an HSBC account held by Global Trading Solutions.

Later that month, reports also indicated that Bitfinex was banking with Hong Kong-based Bank of Communications via the private accounts of “Prosperity Revenue Merchandising Limited” for whom Citibank acts as an intermediary bank.

In November, Bitifinex announced another new banking partner, publishing a letter attributed to Bahamas Deltec Bank & Trust asserting that the company held $1.8 billion in its account as of Oct. 31.

Bitfinex’s Cayman-Based Bank Falsely Claims SEC Registration

During January 2019, it was revealed that Bitfinex was banking with Cayman Islands-based Sackville Bank & Trust Company. Sackville’s principal custodian bank is CIBC Mellon which is jointly owned by The Bank of New York Mellon and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.

Despite Sackville’s website asserting that the company operates according to its “full registration with US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),” it appears that Sackville’s SEC registration was terminated as of April 2018.

Bitfinex Partnered With at Least 6 Different Banks During 2018

Throughout Bitfinex’s banking fiasco, social media reports suggest that at least $1.67 million worth of fiat withdrawals have not been processed by the exchange since September 2018, in addition to nearly $3.57 million worth of unprocessed withdrawal attempts that have since been cancelled.

While discussing Wells Fargo’s suspension of wire transfers to and from Bitfinex, the exchange’s former chief strategy officer, Phil Potter, previously stated: “We’ve had banking hiccups in the past, we’ve always been able to route around it … open up new accounts … shift to a different entity, lots of cat and mouse tricks.”

What do you think of Bitfinex’s perpetual banking drama? Share your thoughts in the comments section below!


Images courtesy of Shutterstock, Wikipedia


Want to create your own secure cold storage paper wallet? Check our tools section.

The post Bitfinex Partnered With at Least 6 Different Banks During 2018 appeared first on Bitcoin News.

from Bitcoin News http://bit.ly/2MFsKvM Bitfinex Partnered With at Least 6 Different Banks During 2018

#Blockchain Crypto Mining Could Bring Russia $1B in Taxes, Report Suggests

Crypto Mining Could Bring Russia $1B in Taxes, Report Suggests

Using its excess energy generating capacity to mine cryptocurrencies, Russia can increase its budget receipts by more than $1 billion dollars in annual tax revenue. The estimate comes from a report that also calls for the establishment of a Russian crypto valley.  

Also read: Defying Crypto Winter, Swiss Crypto Valley Grows to 750 Companies

70 Billion Rubles Just From Taxes

Russia’s electrical surplus last year reached 20 GW. According to the study conducted by industrial mining solutions provider Bitcluster, that’s enough energy to power 14.8 million of the popular Antminer S9i ASIC devices. If Russia uses the excess electricity to mint digital coins, the state would receive 70 billion rubles (over $1 billion) just from VAT, the authors claim.

Crypto Mining Could Bring Russia $1B in Taxes, Report Suggests

The report notes that a single Antminer S9i consumes approximately 1,350 kWt/h of electrical energy. There are currently around 740,000 units of this model in operation and their total consumption would be about 1 GW. With electricity in Russia priced at 2 rubles ($0.03) per kilowatt-hour, the VAT revenues from these machines would be around 292 million rubles (over $4.4 million) a month.

The researchers have also estimated that the establishment of a crypto valley for Russian miners would require an initial investment of only 1 billion rubles ($15 million), Bitnovosti reported. Bitcluster believes there are enough mining companies and entrepreneurs in Russia that are ready to invest in the development of such a project.

Crypto Business Parks Proposed

According to Bitcluster’s founder Sergei Arestov, the crypto valley could be situated around one of Russia’s numerous hydroelectric power plants. Mining facilities and the infrastructure needed to set up blockchain business parks can be built around the power station and take advantage of cheap and abundant energy supply.

Last year, the Russian Ministry of Finance had a similar idea: to establish territories with a special regulatory regime for companies from the crypto industry. Another proposal discussed by Russian institutions is to create offshore zones for blockchain businesses in Kaliningrad and Vladivostok, and a special economic zone in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea.

Crypto Mining Could Bring Russia $1B in Taxes, Report Suggests

An idea to allow companies from certain industries to use cryptocurrencies in select Russian regions was included recently in a draft law prepared by the Ministry of Economic Development. It’s supported by Anatoly Aksakov, chairman of the important Financial Markets Committee of the Duma, the lower house of parliament.

Russian officials have previously indicated their readiness to support the legalization of crypto mining as a business activity. A package of draft laws aimed at regulating the crypto sector was introduced last spring and three bills were voted on first reading. Their second reading is scheduled to take place during the current session of the Russian parliament. However, the texts underwent significant revision and key terms such as cryptocurrency and mining were dropped.

Do you expect Russia will set up its own crypto valley? Share your thoughts on the subject in the comments section below.


Images courtesy of Shutterstock.


Make sure you do not miss any important Bitcoin-related news! Follow our news feed any which way you prefer; via Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, RSS or email (scroll down to the bottom of this page to subscribe). We’ve got daily, weekly and quarterly summaries in newsletter form. Bitcoin never sleeps. Neither do we.

The post Crypto Mining Could Bring Russia $1B in Taxes, Report Suggests appeared first on Bitcoin News.

from Bitcoin News http://bit.ly/2UkpY1C Crypto Mining Could Bring Russia $1B in Taxes, Report Suggests

#Blockchain Italian Court Orders Bitgrail Founder to Refund $170M of ‘Missing’ Cryptocurrency

Italian Court Orders Bitgrail Founder Firano to Refund $170M of 'Missing' Cryptocurrency

An Italian court has ruled that Francesco Firano, founder of defunct cryptocurrency exchange Bitgrail, was at fault for the disappearance of $170 million worth of the nano digital currency on his exchange last year. Firano, who called himself “The Bomber,” is now “required to return as much of the assets to his customers as possible.

Also read: Just Because Cryptocurrency Isn’t Legal Tender Doesn’t Make it Illegal

Court Seizes Firano’s Personal Assets to Repay Victims

In its ruling, the Italian Bankruptcy Court, which enlisted the services of a court-appointed technical expert, concluded that both Bitgrail and Firano personally be declared bankrupt and forfeit their assets.

Italian Court Orders Bitgrail Founder to Refund $170M of 'Missing' Cryptocurrency

According to documents released by the Bitgrail victims advocacy group, the court’s decision, delivered Jan. 21, authorizes the seizure of Firano’s personal assets. So far, more than $1 million worth of assets have been seized, including a luxury vehicle, the group said. Digital assets worth several million dollars have also been confiscated from Bitgrail accounts and moved to accounts managed by trustees appointed by the court.

The documents show that Firano repeatedly mishandled security matters pertaining to the private keys of Bitgrail users, including his alleged transfer of client funds into wallets belonging to the exchange. Firano had failed to put in place suitable safeguards to prevent repeat, unauthorized withdrawals of nano from the exchange, the court said.

That’s despite tens of millions of dollars worth of nano going ‘missing’ on several occasions due to duplicate withdrawals being fraudulently made from a single request due to a bug. The court berated Firano for not appropriately disclosing the suspicious transactions to his customers.

Italian Court Orders Bitgrail Founder to Refund $170M of 'Missing' Cryptocurrency

For example, the court found that the nano reported lost by Firano on Feb. 9, 2018 had actually been removed from the exchange months earlier, between July 2017 and December 2017. In total, about 10 million nano tokens left the exchange clandestinely during this period, with Firano’s alleged full knowledge, but he did nothing about it.

The most damaging detail relates to how, just days before announcing the $170 million ( 17 million nano) theft, the Bitgrail founder moved 230 BTC (about $1.8 million at the time) into a personal account on another exchange called The Rock Trading, in a bid to swap it for euros. The documents show that Firano had also tried to withdraw money through a bitcoin ATM linked to that exchange.

The court appointed expert concluded:

Therefore it was the Bitgrail exchange that actually requested to the node multiple times to allow the funds to leave the wallet (funds that in fact, had already left the account after the first request) and not the Nano network that allowed multiple withdrawals. The shortfall reported by Firano in February was caused by a transfer request generated by Bitgrail multiple times upon receiving a single request from the user.

Victory for Investors as Firano Seeks Way Out

Meanwhile, Francesco Firano attempted to cheat his way out of the mess. After nano withdrawals were closed on the Bitgrail exchange in January 2018, Firano promised to repay investors 20 percent of their funds, but only “if they agreed to sign a waiver foregoing any legal action against him.”

Italian Court Orders Bitgrail Founder to Refund $170M of 'Missing' Cryptocurrency
Francesco Firano

Later, he announced plans to reopen the exchange and release a new token called Bitgrail Shares, which would be used to reimburse the victims over time. Users called him out, wary that it was an elaborate exit scam, and opted to go to court. Firano argued in a losing case that his exchange was a mere provider of services and that the currencies deposited on the exchange were “regular” since he could not freely use the deposited coins.

A Bitgrail advocacy group has called the court ruling “both a huge win for crypto users and a cautionary tale for cryptocurrency exchange owners, who have been provided with a clear example of how not to run an exchange or handle a loss of funds.”

What do you think about this turn of events in the Bitgrail case?  Let us know what you think in the comments section below.


Images courtesy of Shutterstock and Twitter.


Express yourself freely at Bitcoin.com’s user forums. We don’t censor on political grounds. Check forum.Bitcoin.com

The post Italian Court Orders Bitgrail Founder to Refund $170M of ‘Missing’ Cryptocurrency appeared first on Bitcoin News.

from Bitcoin News http://bit.ly/2TkPiVk Italian Court Orders Bitgrail Founder to Refund $170M of ‘Missing’ Cryptocurrency

#Blockchain Civil Forfeiture Is State-Sanctioned Theft

Civil Forfeiture Is State-Sanctioned Theft

Ever since 1929, the FBI has shared annual crime statistics via the Uniform Crime Reporting Program. Each year, it breaks down criminal activity into such categories as homicide, weapons, human trafficking, and hate crime. One category that is noticeably absent from the report is civil asset forfeiture. In the eyes of the law, this is a perfectly reasonable provision for seizing ill-gotten gains from suspects. But for the victims of this procedure, it goes by a simpler name – theft.

Also read: Mystery Bitcoin Miners Are Altering Mining Pool Dominance

From Money Laundering to Civil Forfeiture

Civil Forfeiture Is State-Sanctioned TheftIn the olden days, being found in possession of money was not a crime. As a result, police had no authority to seize a suspect’s funds unless they could prove that they were the proceeds of a heist. If you were a jewel thief, you could simply swap your gemstones for dollars and stuff them under your mattress in the knowledge that the feds couldn’t touch them. Then money laundering and proceeds of crime laws came into effect, triggering a cat and mouse game between cops and robbers that has persisted to this day.

One of the most controversial laws to have been introduced is civil forfeiture. It enables U.S. law enforcement (LE) to take cash from individuals who have not been charged with any crime, and to use it for their own ends. With cops authorized to act merely on the “preponderance of evidence” rather the on “beyond reasonable doubt,” which is the standard required for conviction, it’s trivial to seize the assets of anyone police take a disliking to. Retrieving them, for the victims of the forfeiture act, is virtually impossible.

In the last 10 years, the Drug Enforcement Administration has seized over $4 billion in cash in this manner, despite the fact that in over 80% of cases, no criminal charges were ever filed. With agencies strongly incentivized to enforce asset forfeiture, it’s a law that is ripe for abuse.

The Long History of Civil Forfeiture

Civil Forfeiture Is State-Sanctioned TheftLike many laws, civil forfeiture has a storied history that, in this case can be traced back to the 17th century. In the mid-1600s, British maritime laws obliged ships entering domestic ports to fly the British flag. Failure to comply would result in the cargo being seized, regardless of whether the vessel was carrying contraband. Four centuries later, and little has changed. The cargo today is generally drugs – or at least that’s the reason stated for seizing funds, as if that alone was justification for relieving potentially innocent citizens of their cash.

The legality of the war on drugs is a debate for another time. What is beyond debate, however, is that an overwhelming proportion of those targeted by civil forfeiture laws are minorities who, in many cases, have done nothing wrong other than to be of the “wrong color” and in the wrong place at the wrong time.

In extreme cases, cops become robbers and go through suspected dealers’ doors, pocketing the proceeds which don’t even make it to the precinct. But even when LE doesn’t act outside the confines of the law, it retains the power to act unreasonably through confiscating the assets of individuals using the sort of hearsay evidence that wouldn’t stand up in court.

If Civil Forfeiture Is State-Sanctioned Theft, Bitcoin Is the Solution

Civil forfeiture is a provision that requires victims to prove a negative if they wish to keep their cash. How do you prove that your assets aren’t the proceeds of crime? Look around the objects in your home, for example: you might know that your designer clothes, furniture, gadgets and consumer electronics weren’t illegally obtained, but could you prove that to law enforcement if put on the spot? It’s a burden of proof that hardly anyone would be able to meet. If the feds decide they want your assets, you’re screwed.

Given the impunity with which LE can acquisition the wealth of anyone they take a disliking to, seizure-resistant money sells itself. It’s a case that doesn’t require overstating, but there are nevertheless caveats to add. If the bitcoin owners don’t conceal their assets, as the likes of Ross Ulbricht and Alexandre Cazes discovered, the feds will seize your crypto along with anything else they can get their hands on. Thankfully, bitcoin is easily concealable, requiring little more than a dozen words scrawled on a piece of paper and stashed in a safe place. As Walter White found in Breaking Bad, concealing millions of dollars in cash can be a headache.

Civil Forfeiture Is State-Sanctioned Theft

However you acquired your fortune, you owe it to yourself to conceal it from prying eyes and probing three-letter agencies that have no right to requisition it. To date, bitcoin is the best form of seizure-resistant money that’s ever existed. Store your wealth in crypto and then stash your private key in a safe place, be it a bank vault, a box in the ground, or your brain.

Do you think civil forfeiture laws are wrong? Let us know in the comments section below.


Images courtesy of Shutterstock.


Need to calculate your bitcoin holdings? Check our tools section.

The post Civil Forfeiture Is State-Sanctioned Theft appeared first on Bitcoin News.

from Bitcoin News http://bit.ly/2G7hnLW Civil Forfeiture Is State-Sanctioned Theft

#Blockchain Van Eck Associates CEO: Bitcoin Investors Will Add Gold This Year

Gold and bitcoin markets have have attracted comparisons for some time now, with gold investors taking an interest in the cryptocurrency during the 2017 bull market. But some of these investors are now reintroducing gold to their portfolio, according to Jan Van Eck of Van Eck Associates. 

Also read: 8 Food Delivery Sites That Accept Cryptocurrency 

Bitcoin vs Gold

Van Eck, whose firm created the most popular gold exchange-traded funds, has said that investors are now going back to gold, despite being lured away from it last year. He said that his company had polled bitcoin investors and learned that they were now interested in adding gold as an investment. “I do think that bitcoin pulled a little bit of demand away from gold last year, in 2017,” Van Eck was quoted as saying in an interview with CNBC. He added:

Interestingly, we just polled 4,000 bitcoin investors and their number one investment for 2019 is actually gold. So gold lost to bitcoin and now it’s going the other way.

Van Eck’s comments should be taken with a pinch of salt, however, as his survey didn’t ask investors outright whether they prefer gold over bitcoin. Rather, it asked them which assets they planned to own in the future in addition to bitcoin, of which gold, their first choice, is an obvious candidate.

Gold has long been a safe bet for investors. But bitcoin, described by some as “digital gold,” has also been hailed as a store of value. Tim Seymour, chief investment officer of Seymour Asset Management, was quoted as saying: “Not only have we lost all liquidity on the underlying [commodity] but truly outside of the existential blockchain argument, it’s been very difficult to argue [that bitcoin is a] store of value which is really what we started hearing about.” He added: “Gold is a store of value and there’s no disputing that.”

Bitcoin’s Relationship With Gold

Bitcoin has a complex but intimate relationship with gold. Researchers have previously said that the value of cryptocurrencies spikes when gold markets slump, and when gold prices jump, digital assets drop in value. When BTC’s price surged in December 2017, there was a marginally negative correlation with gold, though the correlation has previously been difficult to prove as bitcoin is such a new asset.

Van Eck Associates CEO: Bitcoin Investors Will Add Gold This Year

Many bitcoin proponents, analysts, and gold investors have made the connection between the two as they are seen as safe havens that form an effective store of value and protection against the world’s volatile economy.

What do you think about the relationship between gold and bitcoin? Do you agree with Van Eck’s comments? Share your thoughts in the section below.


Images courtesy of Shutterstock.


Verify and track bitcoin cash transactions on our BCH Block Explorer, the best of its kind anywhere in the world. Also, keep up with your holdings, BCH and other coins, on our market charts at Satoshi’s Pulse, another original and free service. 

The post Van Eck Associates CEO: Bitcoin Investors Will Add Gold This Year appeared first on Bitcoin News.

from Bitcoin News http://bit.ly/2UqQx5A Van Eck Associates CEO: Bitcoin Investors Will Add Gold This Year

#Blockchain Bitcoin Mixing Concept Payjoin Makes a ‘Huge Mess’ for Blockchain Surveillance

On Jan. 24, Adam Gibson, author of Waxwing’s Joinmarket blog, wrote about an interesting Coinjoin concept called Payjoin. The protocol further obfuscates the ownership of UTXO inputs during a Coinjoin transaction mixing cycle. According to Gibson, the Payjoin technique is “another nail in the coffin of blockchain analysis.”

Also read: Mystery Bitcoin Miners Are Altering Mining Pool Dominance

Payjoin Bitcoin UTXO Mixing Method Improves Coinjoin’s Privacy Technique

Over the past few years, blockchain analysis has kicked into high gear as law enforcement and governments have begun heavily funding companies that offer this service. On the opposite side of the spectrum, cryptocurrency privacy advocates have been building applications that make bitcoins more fungible. One way of adding privacy to bitcoin core (BTC) and bitcoin cash (BCH) transactions is a method called Coinjoin. The practice combines multiple payments from multiple entities into a single transaction. This technique makes it difficult for blockchain analysts to find each derivation point and the identity of the spenders. The Joinmarket project uses the Coinjoin method and allows users to mix their coins and keep control over their private keys throughout the process. The application also incentivizes people to add liquidity to the market by providing users with the ability to charge fees. However, Gibson notes that a traditional Coinjoin transaction is susceptible to looking different to typical unmixed transaction.

Bitcoin Mixing Concept Payjoin Makes a 'Huge Mess' for Blockchain Surveillance
A Coinjoin BTC transaction.

This is because a Coinjoin uses precise and multiple equal-value outputs, which essentially showcases an anonymity set. Repeated mixing rounds create a much larger anonymity set, but they are still noticeable by a trained blockchain analyst. Essentially the Payjoin concept allows Bob to create an “obfuscation of ownership of the inputs without it looking different from an ordinary payment” with his customer Alice. Gibson’s research details that he’s not entirely sure who came up with the Payjoin idea, but he’s seen it mentioned in a blog post written by Matthew Haywood last summer and a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) published by developer Ryan Havar.

Payjoin’s Four Advantages

Gibson’s study also emphasizes that there are four fundamental advantages to the Payjoin concept. The first is hiding the payment amount and Gibson states that blockchain analysts see this as “a huge mess.” Advantage two is breaking heuristics and doing so without flagging that breakage has occurred. “This is enormously important, even if the breakage of the assumption of common input ownership on its own seems rather trivial (especially if Payjoin is used by only a few people), with only two counterparties in each transaction,” Gibson remarked.

Bitcoin Mixing Concept Payjoin Makes a 'Huge Mess' for Blockchain Surveillance
Two advantages of using the Payjoin method.

The next benefit is Unspent Transaction Output (UTXO) sanitation and Payjoin bolsters this action by making each payment that comes in consume the UTXO of the last payment. The last advantage is hiding out in a large crowd, which basically makes anonymity sets “indistinguishable from ordinary payments.”

“Let’s say 5% of payments used this method — The point is that nobody will know which 5% of payments are Payjoin — That is a great achievement because it means that all payments, including ones that don’t use Payjoin, gain a privacy advantage,” explains Gibson’s post.

The author conceded:

This is another nail in the coffin of blockchain analysis — If 5% of us do this, it will not be safe to assume that a totally ordinary looking payment is not a Coinjoin.

Gibson explains that right now there are only two services providing this type of Coinjoin solution: Samourai Wallet’s Stowaway, and Joinmarket 0.5.2 which was just released. Gibson has published a demonstration of Payjoin in his prior blog post and notes that while helpful in a peer-to-peer fashion, both Stowaway and Joinmarket are not ready for large scale merchant automation.

What do you think about the Payjoin concept? What projects do you see improving cryptocurrency fungibility? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.


Image credits: Shutterstock, Waxwing’s blog, en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Coinjoin, and Pixabay. 


Want to create your own secure cold storage paper wallet? Check our tools section.

The post Bitcoin Mixing Concept Payjoin Makes a ‘Huge Mess’ for Blockchain Surveillance appeared first on Bitcoin News.

from Bitcoin News http://bit.ly/2sRvT2P Bitcoin Mixing Concept Payjoin Makes a ‘Huge Mess’ for Blockchain Surveillance

#Blockchain Arwen Enables Self-Custody for Traders of Centralized Crypto Exchanges

Centralized exchanges are a common security concern in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. As a single point of failure they can be strong-armed by governments, routinely targeted by hackers, or operators could pull an exit scam and elope with client funds. Despite these risks, they dominate cryptocurrency trading volumes. A new solution promises to enable trade to use centralized exchanges but without handing over control of coins to them.

Also Read: Belarus’ Largest Bank May Establish a Cryptocurrency Exchange

Not Your Keys, Not Your Coins

Boston-based startup Arwen (formerly Commonwealth Crypto) announced on Jan. 28 the release of its testnet trading application. The company aims to bring atomic swaps to mainstream cryptocurrency trading with its technology. Using the service, traders can deposit their coins in an onchain escrow, rather than with an exchange, removing the need to trust the centralized venue to handle the money. This allows them to maintain custody of their coins while trading on a centralized exchange without having to transfer coins to the exchange’s omnibus wallet or their keys to a third-party web server.

Arwen Enables Self-Custody for Traders of Centralized Crypto Exchanges

“If you do not hold the keys, you do not own your coins,” Arwen’s CEO Sharon Goldberg stated. “The ethos behind cryptocurrency is built upon a trustless, non-custodial technology. Centralized exchanges are needed for liquidity; however, the exchange of customer coins should be executed in a trustless way. We have solved … that problem.”

Kucoin Is Already on Board

Arwen also announced it is teaming up with the popular Singapore-based global cryptocurrency exchange Kucoin to offer its customers the possibility of using the new service. In addition to Kucoin, the startup reports being in talks with other exchanges about integrating the protocol. It currently supports trading on BTC, LTC, BCH, ZEC and ETH as well as ERC20 tokens.

Arwen Enables Self-Custody for Traders of Centralized Crypto Exchanges

Kucoin President Eric Don commented: “KuCoin has been working hard to ensure the security of the exchange itself, and we are one of the few exchanges that are rated A in terms of security by ICOrating, but we are also exploring other ways to satisfy users who have extreme security requirements and do not trust any third party. [Arwen’s] escrow mechanism enables users who have extreme security requirements to have a higher sense of security in transactions.”

What do you think about using a protocol such as Arwen’s for trading? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.


Images courtesy of Shutterstock.


Verify and track bitcoin cash transactions on our BCH Block Explorer, the best of its kind anywhere in the world. Also, keep up with your holdings, BCH and other coins, on our market charts at Satoshi’s Pulse, another original and free service from Bitcoin.com.

The post Arwen Enables Self-Custody for Traders of Centralized Crypto Exchanges appeared first on Bitcoin News.

from Bitcoin News http://bit.ly/2UswK5P Arwen Enables Self-Custody for Traders of Centralized Crypto Exchanges

#Blockchain Back to Basics: What Is Money?

Our current economic system can be compared to a merry-go-round that has us consuming, trapped in debt and spending as quickly as we earn. What is fiat currency? Why do we use it and who controls it? And how does it compare to gold and bitcoin? It is worth going back to basics, to better understand the fundamentals of what makes money money.

Also Read: Why a Global Recession Would Be Good for Bitcoin

What Is Money?

Back to Basics: What Is Fiat Money?
The earliest coin, featuring a lion

The first ever currency is credited to King Alyattes in Lydia in 600BC, and the first coin ever minted features a roaring lion, according to the Greek historian Herodotus. Fast forward to the 21st century, and fiat money is now paper money and coins are not convertible into gold or silver but are made legal tender by fiat (order) of the government. Fiat currency is used for trade, to facilitate the direct exchange of goods and services. Without money we cannot easily acquire basic necessities such as accommodation, food and clothing.

The value of a nation’s currency is strongly tied to the value of its imports and exports. So any country that exports gold or has access to gold reserves will also see an increase in the strength of its currency when gold prices rise since this increases the value of the country’s total exports.

Back to Basics: What Is Fiat Money?A new medium of exchange in the form of cryptocurrencies arrived when Satoshi Nakamoto launched Bitcoin in 2009. Unlike government issued currencies, Bitcoin has no central party responsible for controlling it.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an organization that monitors global economic and financial developments. It defines money as follows:

In short, money can be anything that can serve as a store of value, which means people can save it and use it later—smoothing their purchases over time; unit of account, that is, provide a common base for prices; or  medium of exchange, something that people can use to buy and sell from one another.

The IMF’s managing director Christine Lagarde acknowledges that money itself is changing, as cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin and ethereum vie for a spot in the cashless world, with the promise of quicker and cheaper settlement.

Who Controls Fiat Money?

Back to Basics: What Is Fiat Money?

In the U.S., monetary supply is controlled by the Federal Reserve, while around the world prominent central banks such as the Bank of England, European Central Bank, Swiss National Bank, People’s Bank of China, and Bank of Japan control fiat by adjusting its supply and the cost of borrowing it through setting interest rates. 

The interest rate is the percentage charged on the total amount you borrow or save. Even a small change in rates can have a huge impact. These tools give the Federal Reserve and central banks free will to create booms and busts within the economy. Central banks also monitor the amount of money in the economy by measuring so-called monetary aggregates.

Politics and macroeconomic trends are important themes to follow as this affects the quantity of money circulating in an economy. This is why the escalating trade war between the U.S. and China is extremely important to follow. The IMF has warned that trade war could cost the global economy $430 billion. The impact of this will trickle down and hurt consumers. As U.S. President James Garfield noted in 1881:

Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce. And when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate.

Understanding Inflation

In economics, inflation is the increase in the price of goods and services in an economy over a period of time. Inflation occurs when the economy’s aggregate volume of spending grows at a faster rate than its output. This is how governments and banks take your money – through the inflation of their fiat.

Dr Edward W. Younkins, a professor of accountancy and director of the Institute for the Study of Capitalism and Morality, writes: Inflation is a dishonest and deliberate policy and tool of politicians who do not wish to reduce their spending. The government creates new money in order to cover what it spends in excess of its income. The existence of an unbalanced budget is a frequent reason for the government to print more money. When more is spent than is raised by taxes, the government makes up the difference with fiat money. The basic cause of inflation is the government’s unwillingness to cut its spending plans or to raise the funds it desires by increasing taxation or by borrowing from the public.”

The Great Depression and Bank Runs

Back to Basics: What Is Fiat Currency?
Bank run scene from “It’s a Wonderful Life”

Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it. The vast majority of economic crises have been caused by flaws in the monetary system that have recurred repeatedly over the years.

In examining the history of money, is is essential to take in the outbreak of the Great Depression in the fall of 1929 which caused much economic hardship. A “bank run” occurs when a large number of people rush to withdraw their money from a bank, because they believe the bank may cease to function in the near future as it lacks the funds to cover all of its financial obligations. When the monetary system becomes unstable, a bank run becomes a possibility, although this is less likely in a system with moderate inflation. The classic Hollywood movie “It’s a Wonderful Life” captures the Great Depression and bank run perfectly.

Back to Basics: What Is Money?
Northern Rock bank run, 2007.

Bank runs are not a thing of the past. In 2007, Britain had its very own such event. Northern Rock, the U.K’s fifth-biggest mortgage lender at the time, saw the first bank run in Britain since 1866. It was only after the Bank of England said it would stand by the troubled Northern Rock that people calmed down and the pandemonium was quelled.

One of the good things about bitcoin is it’s spurred more people into asking questions about the purpose and function of money.


Sir William Paterson, a Scottish trader and founder of the Bank of England in 1694, perhaps put it best:

The bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing.

The U.S. left the gold standard in 1971, and no country today has its currency backed by gold. More than ever, therefore, fiat currencies, and the interest rates set by the central banks who control them, are backed by nothing more than a promise. Proof of work cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin, in comparison, while wholly digital in nature, are backed by the energy expended by tens of thousands of miners that secure the network and validate transactions. Coupled with the provable scarcity that comes from having a fixed and knowable supply, and bitcoin takes the best elements of gold and combines them with fiat currency’s ease of exchange. Modern technology has given us the opportunity to evolve our monetary system and bitcoin is leading the way.

Will bitcoin become the new global currency? Let us know in the comments section below.


Images courtesy of Shutterstock, BBC, British Museum, IMF and IMDb.


Need to calculate your bitcoin holdings? Check our tools section.

 

The post Back to Basics: What Is Money? appeared first on Bitcoin News.

from Bitcoin News http://bit.ly/2Tl3bmf Back to Basics: What Is Money?

#Blockchain Mystery Bitcoin Miners Are Altering Mining Pool Dominance

Mystery Bitcoin Miners Shift Mining Pool Dominance Immensely

During the first month of 2019, studies have revealed the growing trend of unknown miners processing blocks on the Bitcoin Core (BTC) network. A few years ago, most mining pools began revealing their identity via the coinbase parameter when they found a block. Over the last two years, however, unknown miners have started to dominate as established operations have lost a considerable share of hashrate.

Also read: Bloq Labs Reveals Software Suite That Aims to Increase Hash Power by Double Digits

Unknown Bitcoin Miners Have Been Shifting Hashrate Dominance

The bitcoin mining industry is extremely competitive, with the overall SHA-256 hashrate for major public blockchains growing immensely over the years. Between the two most popular mined SHA-256 coins, bitcoin cash (BCH) and bitcoin core (BTC), 41.8 exahashes per second (EH/s) are currently securing both chains. A recent study from the researchers at Diar explains how unknown miners are shifting the dominance of major known mining pools.

Mystery Bitcoin Miners Are Altering Mining Pool Dominance
Unknown pools have shifted the dominance of large mining pools like Btc.com, Antpool, and Viabtc.

“Unknown miners closed December having solved a whopping 22% of the total blocks up from 6% at the start of last year,” explains Diar’s research report. It continues:

The small miner exodus could be a possible positive for Bitcoin’s network security as smaller miners joined to the hip of large pools began turning off their computing power resulting in a decline in mining pool dominance.

The researchers say there could be “concerns” with the growth of unknown mining pools. Diar’s report explains that just because the miner chooses not to disclose its identity doesn’t mean the source of the hash power isn’t an existing known pool. The researchers note that the three large pools of Btc.com, Antpool, and Viabtc have all seen their percentage of total hashrate decline over the past year, even though they have added a 55 percent increase in pooled resources. In January of 2018, those three combined pools had 53 percent of the network while now they have less than 39 percent the report details.

Coinmetrics Notices the Resurgence of Mystery Miners After Parsing 450,000 BTC Blocks

Diar is not the only analysis team that has picked up on this growing trend of unknown mining pools. During the first week of 2019, cryptocurrency analytics site Coinmetrics noticed the same thing. After parsing the coinbase outputs from the last 450,000 BTC blocks, the researchers noted that one mystery arising from the charts is “the resurgence of unknown miners.” Coinmetrics details that between mid-2015 and mid-2017, most miners disclosed their identity through the coinbase parameter to identify themselves with the name of their pool.

“However, through 2018, unknown miners picked up — This may be due to the waning importance of miner signaling due to the resolution of the Segwit saga, a newly-found appreciation for privacy, or the emergence of miners who have something to hide,” explains Coinmetrics’ granular mining pool mapping research.

Mystery Bitcoin Miners Are Altering Mining Pool Dominance
Coinmetrics chart of the 450,000 BTC blocks the team parsed that shows the resurgence of anonymous miners.

Unknown Mining Pools Have Increased Since the Peak of the 2017 Scaling Debate

The resurgence of unknown miners is also prevalent within the BCH network. During the first few months after Aug. 1, 2017, the BCH network had a significant amount of unknown miners processing blocks. This period of time is when the shift seemingly began for both the BTC and BCH networks as it introduced the possibility for SHA-256 mining pools to switch between both chains depending on profitability.

Mystery Bitcoin Miners Are Altering Mining Pool Dominance
BTC mining pools (left) and BCH mining pools (right) on Jan. 28, 2019. Today, mystery miners command more than 22% of the BTC chain and 17% of the BCH chain. 

Since then, the rise of unknown mining pool sightings on both chains has continued to increase, and during the Nov. 15, 2018 BCH chain split, there was a huge influx of unknown miners on both networks. At the time of publication, unknown mining entities make up more than 17 percent of the BCH network. Similarly, on Jan. 28, 2019, the BTC chain’s hashrate distribution shows there’s roughly 22.7 percent of unknown miners processing BTC blocks.

What do you think about the resurgence of unknown miners taking away the dominance of known mining pools? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.


Image credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Diar, Coinmetrics, Blockchain.com, and Coin Dance. 


Want to create your own secure cold storage paper wallet? Check our tools section.

The post Mystery Bitcoin Miners Are Altering Mining Pool Dominance appeared first on Bitcoin News.

from Bitcoin News http://bit.ly/2FUh348 Mystery Bitcoin Miners Are Altering Mining Pool Dominance